Benchgen

MM-Mind2Web

1 phaseActive

Screenshot-paired version of Mind2Web spanning 2,022 tasks and 14,193 actions across seen/unseen websites and domains, for evaluating multimodal web agents.

Overview

MM-Mind2Web

Category Metric Tasks Saturation Created

Paper GitHub

Quick answer: Multimodal-Mind2Web (MM-Mind2Web) pairs every HTML page in the original Mind2Web web-agent benchmark with its corresponding webpage screenshot, enabling large multimodal models like GPT-4V to be evaluated as generalist web agents that see and act on real websites rather than reasoning over HTML alone.

At a Glance

What it tests: Whether an LMM-powered web agent can plan and execute multi-step actions (click, type, select) across real websites, evaluated on seen websites, unseen websites within seen domains, and entirely unseen domains.

Why it matters: MM-Mind2Web was introduced alongside SeeAct to demonstrate that GPT-4V has strong potential as a generalist web agent when its textual plans can be grounded into concrete on-page actions — but that grounding, not planning, remains the key bottleneck.

Known limitations: Offline evaluation uses cached HTML/screenshot snapshots, so agent actions aren't validated against a live, changing website; the paper's online evaluation setting (via live websites) partially addresses this but is harder to reproduce at scale.

What MM-Mind2Web Measures

MM-Mind2Web aligns every HTML document in the original Mind2Web dataset with its corresponding webpage screenshot image, removing the need to download Mind2Web's ~300GB raw dump just to get visual context. It preserves Mind2Web's three evaluation splits — test_task (seen websites), test_website (unseen websites within seen domains), and test_domain (entirely unseen domains) — spanning a combined 2,022 tasks and 14,193 individual actions.

The accompanying SeeAct system uses large multimodal models (initially GPT-4V) to interpret each webpage screenshot, reason about the next action in natural language, and then ground that plan into a concrete UI action using either HTML-structure-based grounding, visual grounding, or a hybrid of both. The paper found GPT-4V could complete 51.1% of live-website tasks when its plans were manually grounded, substantially outperforming text-only LLMs and earlier fine-tuned web-agent baselines, but grounding strategies like set-of-mark prompting proved less effective than expected, leaving a real gap versus oracle grounding.

MM-Mind2Web has become a standard reference for evaluating multimodal web agents' ability to generalize across websites and domains they haven't seen during training.

Benchmark Specifications

FieldValue
Task categoryAgent (multimodal web navigation)
MetricElement accuracy, step success rate, and task success rate across three generalization splits
Number of tasks2,022 tasks (14,193 actions) across test_task, test_website, and test_domain splits
SaturationLow — grounding remains a major bottleneck even for strong LMMs
Created byBoyuan Zheng, Boyu Gou, Jihyung Kil, Huan Sun, Yu Su
Source paperZheng et al. 2024 (ICML 2024)
CodeGitHub
DatasetHugging Face

How MM-Mind2Web Is Scored

Offline evaluation compares predicted actions (element + operation) against ground-truth action sequences, reporting element accuracy and step-level success rate. The paper's online evaluation setting additionally runs agents on live websites and measures end-to-end task success rate, either with manual grounding verification or fully automated grounding.

State-of-the-Art Results

Scores vary significantly by grounding strategy (HTML-based, visual, hybrid) and whether evaluation is offline or on live websites. See the official repository for current standings.

MM-Mind2Web on Benchgen

No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run MM-Mind2Web.

MM-Mind2Web vs Other Benchmarks

BenchmarkWhat it testsTasksSaturation
MM-Mind2WebMultimodal web-agent grounding across seen/unseen sites & domains2,022low
MMSearchMultimodal AI search-engine capability300low
Design2CodeScreenshot-to-code front-end generation484low

MM-Mind2Web focuses on grounded action-taking on real websites, complementing MMSearch's focus on search-specific reasoning and Design2Code's focus on generating front-end code from visual designs.

Run MM-Mind2Web on Your Model

Benchgen lets teams run their own multimodal web agent stack against MM-Mind2Web's seen/unseen splits on demand, tracking element accuracy and task success rate over time to catch generalization regressions as agent architectures change.

Explore related agent and multimodal benchmarks like MMSearch and Design2Code to compare web-agent grounding with search reasoning and code-generation evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MM-Mind2Web? MM-Mind2Web (Multimodal-Mind2Web) pairs the Mind2Web web-agent benchmark's HTML pages with webpage screenshots, enabling large multimodal models to be evaluated as generalist web agents on 2,022 tasks across seen and unseen websites/domains.
What does a good MM-Mind2Web score look like? In the original SeeAct paper, GPT-4V completed 51.1% of live-website tasks with manual grounding verification, substantially ahead of text-only LLM baselines — fully automated grounding strategies still trail this oracle-assisted number.
Who created MM-Mind2Web? MM-Mind2Web was created by Boyuan Zheng and collaborators at The Ohio State University, alongside the SeeAct system, accepted at ICML 2024.