Benchgen

ERQA — Results

RankModelScore
1qwen3-8-flash-next72.3
2qwen3-8-27b65.5
E

ERQA

1 phaseActive

400 multiple-choice visual questions testing embodied/physical-world reasoning — spatial, trajectory, action, state estimation, and multi-view — released alongside Gemini Robotics.

Overview

ERQA

Category Metric Tasks Saturation Created

Paper GitHub

Quick answer: ERQA (Embodied Reasoning Question Answering, Google DeepMind, 2025) is a 400-question multiple-choice visual benchmark testing a model's ability to reason about the physical world — spatial relationships, object trajectories, multi-view consistency, and state estimation — released alongside the Gemini Robotics paper. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores 72.3% as of August 2026.

At a Glance

What it tests: Whether a multimodal model can answer visual multiple-choice questions requiring embodied/physical-world reasoning — spatial relationships, action/trajectory reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning across images — rather than purely linguistic or static-scene understanding.

Why it matters: Most multimodal QA benchmarks test static-scene perception or language-grounded reasoning; ERQA specifically probes reasoning skills relevant to embodied agents and robots operating in the physical world, released as part of Google DeepMind's Gemini Robotics work to measure whether a model's visual reasoning actually transfers to real-world physical interaction.

Known limitations: At only 400 questions, ERQA is a relatively small evaluation set, so individual-question variance can matter more than on larger benchmarks; it is also newer (2025) and has fewer third-party-tracked model scores than longer-established multimodal benchmarks.

What ERQA Measures

ERQA evaluates multimodal models on 400 multiple-choice visual questions spanning categories such as spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning — the kinds of visual-world understanding an embodied agent (e.g. a robot) needs before it can act physically on what it perceives. It was released by the Gemini Robotics Team at Google DeepMind alongside their "Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World" paper, as a way to isolate and measure the embodied-reasoning capability of a vision-language model independent of the robot-control stack built on top of it.

Benchmark Specifications

FieldValue
Task categoryReasoning (embodied/physical-world)
Metric% accuracy
Number of tasks400 multiple-choice questions
SaturationLow
Created byGemini Robotics Team (Google DeepMind)
Source paperGemini Robotics Team et al. 2025
GitHubembodiedreasoning/ERQA

How ERQA Is Scored

Each of the 400 multiple-choice questions is scored correct or incorrect against a fixed ground-truth answer; the overall score is the percentage of questions answered correctly.

State-of-the-Art Results

RankModelScoreSourceDate
1Qwen3.8-Flash-Next72.3%Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model card2026-08
2Qwen3.8-27B65.5%Qwen3.8-27B model card2026-08

Scores above are self-reported by Alibaba's Qwen Team on the official Hugging Face model cards and shown for context. They are not Benchgen measurements, and are not drawn from a shared third-party leaderboard — only the 2 scores above are currently tracked locally. Both scores are independently cross-confirmed against llm-stats.com/benchmarks/erqa, which tracks 28 models on this benchmark.

ERQA on Benchgen

No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run ERQA.

ERQA vs Other Benchmarks

BenchmarkWhat it testsSaturation
ERQAEmbodied/physical-world visual reasoning (spatial, trajectory, multi-view)Low
AndroidWorldDynamic, parameterized mobile-use agent controlLow
OSWorld-VerifiedReal desktop/web computer-use agent control—

ERQA is a static visual-QA probe of embodied reasoning, distinct from the live-environment agent benchmarks like AndroidWorld or OSWorld-Verified — use it to assess whether a model's visual understanding of physical scenes (spatial relationships, trajectories, multi-view consistency) is sound, independent of whether it can also execute multi-step actions in a live environment.

Run ERQA on Your Model

Benchgen lets you evaluate your own multimodal model against ERQA's 400 embodied-reasoning questions and track results across model versions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ERQA? ERQA (Embodied Reasoning Question Answering) is a Google DeepMind benchmark released alongside the Gemini Robotics paper (2025) that tests multimodal models on 400 multiple-choice visual questions requiring physical-world reasoning — spatial relationships, trajectories, state estimation, and multi-view consistency.
What does a good ERQA score look like? Qwen3.8-Flash-Next reports 72.3% as of August 2026, the highest currently tracked on Benchgen; Qwen3.8-27B scores 65.5%.
Who created ERQA? ERQA was created by the Gemini Robotics Team at Google DeepMind; see the original paper.
Is ERQA saturated? No — ERQA remains a low-saturation benchmark; its 400 embodied-reasoning questions probing spatial/trajectory/multi-view understanding keep meaningful headroom between models.
How does ERQA differ from AndroidWorld? ERQA is a static visual multiple-choice QA benchmark testing embodied reasoning about physical scenes, while AndroidWorld is a live, dynamic agent-control environment testing multi-step task execution on a real Android device — ERQA probes understanding, AndroidWorld probes action.

Benchmark definition paraphrased from Gemini Robotics Team et al. 2025. State-of-the-art scores sourced from published model cards and attributed inline. Last updated 2026-10-31.