| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | fugu-ultra | 93.6 |
| 2 | qwen3-8-max | 92.9 |
| 3 | gpt-5-6-sol | 91.5 |
| 4 | fugu | 86.6 |
1 phaseActive
Google DeepMind's Multi-Range Context Retrieval benchmark v2 — tests AI on accurate multi-hop recall across long contexts. Fugu Ultra leads at 93.6%.
Quick answer: MRCRv2 (Multi-turn Retrieval Correctness and Relevance, version 2) evaluates AI models on accurate information retrieval across long, multi-turn conversation contexts. It tests whether a model can correctly recall and reason over information introduced earlier in extended dialogues. Fugu Ultra scores 93.6% — the highest among evaluated systems — and Fugu scores 86.6% as of June 2026.
What it tests: Long-context retrieval accuracy — whether a model can recall specific facts, instructions, or details from earlier in a multi-turn conversation, even when the context has grown very long.
Why it matters: In agentic and assistant workflows, models must maintain accurate recall across long interaction histories. MRCRv2 directly measures this retrieval fidelity under realistic multi-turn conditions.
Known limitations: Retrieval-focused benchmarks may not capture reasoning quality — a model can retrieve accurately but still fail to reason correctly with retrieved information. Results are sensitive to context window size and attention patterns.
MRCRv2 presents models with extended multi-turn conversation histories containing specific facts, instructions, or details spread across many turns. At test time, the model is queried about information from earlier in the conversation — sometimes from the very beginning, sometimes from the middle — requiring accurate long-range retrieval even when more recent content may create interference.
The benchmark tests both retrieval correctness (is the recalled fact accurate?) and the model's ability to maintain relevant attention across a context window that may span hundreds of thousands of tokens. Scores above 90% indicate reliable long-context recall.
Notably, Fugu Ultra (93.6%) outperforms Fugu (86.6%) by 7 percentage points on this benchmark, suggesting that deeper multi-agent coordination benefits long-context retrieval tasks — likely because Fugu Ultra can use specialist agents for document comprehension.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Reasoning / long-context retrieval |
| Metric | % correct |
| Type | Multi-turn conversation retrieval |
| Version | 2 (MRCRv2) |
| Saturation | Low |
| Rank | Model | Score | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fugu Ultra | 93.6% | Sakana Fugu technical report | 2026-06 |
| 2 | Fable 5 / Mythos Preview (max) | 94.8% (baseline) | Sakana Fugu technical report | 2026-06 |
| 3 | Fugu | 86.6% | Sakana Fugu technical report | 2026-06 |
Scores sourced from Sakana AI's Fugu technical report, June 2026. Note: one baseline model scores 94.8% — likely Fable 5 or Mythos Preview individually; Fugu Ultra at 93.6% is the highest publicly accessible API result.