Benchgen

VLGuard — Results

RankModelScore
1shieldstral-1-097.7
2omniguard-7b88.5
3nemotron-3-5-content-safety-4b84.2
4llavaguard-7b69.5
5shieldgemma-2-4b61.3
6llamaguard-4-12b59.9
V

VLGuard

1 phaseActive

A vision-language safety dataset for evaluating multimodal harmful content classification. Zong et al., 2024.

Overview

VLGuard

Category Metric Saturation

Paper GitHub

Quick answer: VLGuard measures whether a classifier correctly identifies harmful content in image-plus-text (vision-language) inputs, spanning categories like unsafe images paired with benign-looking text and safe images paired with harmful instructions. It's the benchmark where Shieldstral posts its strongest score of any comparison in Mistral's published results — 97.7% F1 — reflecting its native multimodal safety design.

At a Glance

What it tests: Multimodal safety classification across image-instruction pairs, including cases where harm arises only from the combination of image and text rather than either modality alone. Why it matters: As multimodal LLMs proliferate, safety classifiers built purely for text miss harm that's only visible when image and text are evaluated jointly — VLGuard was one of the earlier datasets specifically targeting this gap. Known limitations: Safety-relevant image data is inherently harder to source responsibly than text (it can't be freely synthesized), so the dataset's absolute size is more limited than large text-only safety corpora.

What VLGuard Measures

VLGuard pairs images with instructions/queries and labels the combination as safe or unsafe, covering scenarios where an unsafe image is paired with an innocuous-seeming caption, and where a safe image is paired with a harmful instruction that only becomes actionable in the visual context. This directly tests whether a guard model's multimodal reasoning genuinely integrates both modalities rather than defaulting to a text-only or image-only judgment.

Benchmark Specifications

FieldValue
Task categorySafety / multimodal content moderation
MetricF1 score (%)
ModalityImage + text
Created byYongshuo Zong, Ondrej Bohdal, Tingyang Yu, Yongxin Yang, Timothy Hospedales
PaperSafety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost / VLGuard (arXiv 2402.02207)
GitHubys-zong/VLGuard

How VLGuard Is Scored

Each image-instruction pair's ground-truth safety label is compared against a classifier's prediction and scored as F1.

State-of-the-Art Results

Scores from the Shieldstral model card (Mistral AI, August 2026). F1 (%). Only models with native multimodal support report scores here.

Scores sourced from Mistral AI's published model card, shown for context. Not Benchgen measurements. Text-only guard models (GPT-OSS-Safeguard, Qwen3Guard, ShieldGemma-9B) do not report scores on this multimodal benchmark.

VLGuard on Benchgen

No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run VLGuard.

VLGuard vs Other Benchmarks

BenchmarkWhat it testsModalitySaturation
VLGuardImage-instruction pair safetyImage + textHigh
UnsafeBenchStandalone unsafe image classificationImage onlyMedium
LlavaGuardFine-grained multimodal policy safetyImage + textMedium

Run VLGuard on Your Model

Benchgen tracks version-controlled, regression-tested guard-model performance — submit your classifier's VLGuard scores to compare against Shieldstral and other multimodal guard models.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is VLGuard? VLGuard is a vision-language safety benchmark pairing images with instructions, testing whether a classifier can detect harm that arises from the combination of image and text.
Why do text-only guard models not appear on this leaderboard? VLGuard requires native image understanding — classifiers without a vision encoder (e.g., most text-only guard models) cannot process this benchmark's inputs.
Who created VLGuard? Yongshuo Zong and colleagues, published in 2024.

Last updated 2026-08-12.