Benchgen

InfoVQA — Results

RankModelScore
1north-micro-vision-instruct65.2
I

InfoVQA

1 phaseActive

Question answering over real-world infographics that combine text, charts, maps, and graphical layouts in a single image.

Overview

InfoVQA

Category Metric Saturation Created

Paper Dataset

Quick answer: InfoVQA (InfographicVQA, Mathew et al., 2021) tests question answering over dense, real-world infographics that combine text, charts, icons, and free-form graphical layouts — a harder document-understanding task than plain scanned-text documents. North Micro Vision scores 65.2% on the validation split as of August 2026.

At a Glance

What it tests: Question answering that requires reading and reasoning jointly over text, numerical data, and graphical elements (icons, maps, charts) laid out non-linearly across a single infographic image.

Why it matters: Real-world documents like infographics, dashboards, and marketing materials mix free-form visual layout with text in ways plain-text OCR benchmarks don't capture; InfoVQA specifically probes this layout-aware reasoning.

Known limitations: Many questions require multi-step numerical reasoning (e.g. summing values from a chart), so scores conflate visual layout understanding with arithmetic reasoning ability.

What InfoVQA Measures

InfoVQA collects real-world infographics — the kind found in reports, presentations, and public-facing communications — that densely combine running text, numerical tables, charts, icons, and non-linear visual layout. Unlike scanned-document benchmarks that test primarily text recognition, InfoVQA questions frequently require integrating information across multiple visual elements: comparing values in a chart, reading an icon's label, or combining a caption with a graphic.

A meaningful share of questions also require basic numerical reasoning — such as computing a difference or a sum from values shown in the infographic — layering arithmetic ability on top of visual-layout and OCR competence.

Because it demands both accurate text/number extraction and correct interpretation of non-standard visual layouts, InfoVQA sits at a harder point on the document-understanding spectrum than plain OCR or scanned-document QA benchmarks like DocVQA.

Benchmark Specifications

FieldValue
Task categoryReasoning (document/infographic understanding)
MetricANLS (Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity)
SaturationMedium
Created byMathew et al.
Source paperMathew et al. 2021
Datasetdocvqa.org InfographicVQA

How InfoVQA Is Scored

Answers are scored using ANLS (Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity), which gives partial credit for near-matches to the ground-truth answer string rather than requiring an exact match — standard practice for open-ended document VQA where minor formatting differences shouldn't be penalized as full misses.

State-of-the-Art Results

Score sourced from Cohere Labs' North Micro Vision Instruct launch announcement, August 2026, evaluated on the validation split.

InfoVQA on Benchgen

No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run InfoVQA.

InfoVQA vs Other Benchmarks

BenchmarkWhat it testsSaturation
InfoVQADense infographics combining text, charts, and layoutMedium
DocVQAScanned/plain-text document question answeringHigh
ChartQAChart-specific reasoning and value extractionMedium

InfoVQA is a harder, more visually-complex sibling to DocVQA — use it when you need to evaluate a model's ability to parse mixed text-and-graphics layouts rather than mostly-linear scanned text.

Run InfoVQA on Your Model

Benchgen lets you evaluate your own vision-language model's infographic and document understanding and track results across model versions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is InfoVQA? InfoVQA (InfographicVQA) is a benchmark testing question answering over real-world infographics that combine text, charts, icons, and free-form visual layout.
What does a good InfoVQA score look like? North Micro Vision Instruct reports 65.2% as of August 2026; strong document-focused vision-language models can reach 75-85%+.
Who created InfoVQA? InfoVQA was created by Mathew et al.; see the original paper.
Is InfoVQA saturated? It shows medium saturation — frontier document-specialist models score highly, but it remains discriminative for general-purpose and compact vision-language models.