| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | north-micro-vision-instruct | 65.2 |
1 phaseActive
Question answering over real-world infographics that combine text, charts, maps, and graphical layouts in a single image.
Quick answer: InfoVQA (InfographicVQA, Mathew et al., 2021) tests question answering over dense, real-world infographics that combine text, charts, icons, and free-form graphical layouts — a harder document-understanding task than plain scanned-text documents. North Micro Vision scores 65.2% on the validation split as of August 2026.
What it tests: Question answering that requires reading and reasoning jointly over text, numerical data, and graphical elements (icons, maps, charts) laid out non-linearly across a single infographic image.
Why it matters: Real-world documents like infographics, dashboards, and marketing materials mix free-form visual layout with text in ways plain-text OCR benchmarks don't capture; InfoVQA specifically probes this layout-aware reasoning.
Known limitations: Many questions require multi-step numerical reasoning (e.g. summing values from a chart), so scores conflate visual layout understanding with arithmetic reasoning ability.
InfoVQA collects real-world infographics — the kind found in reports, presentations, and public-facing communications — that densely combine running text, numerical tables, charts, icons, and non-linear visual layout. Unlike scanned-document benchmarks that test primarily text recognition, InfoVQA questions frequently require integrating information across multiple visual elements: comparing values in a chart, reading an icon's label, or combining a caption with a graphic.
A meaningful share of questions also require basic numerical reasoning — such as computing a difference or a sum from values shown in the infographic — layering arithmetic ability on top of visual-layout and OCR competence.
Because it demands both accurate text/number extraction and correct interpretation of non-standard visual layouts, InfoVQA sits at a harder point on the document-understanding spectrum than plain OCR or scanned-document QA benchmarks like DocVQA.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Reasoning (document/infographic understanding) |
| Metric | ANLS (Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity) |
| Saturation | Medium |
| Created by | Mathew et al. |
| Source paper | Mathew et al. 2021 |
| Dataset | docvqa.org InfographicVQA |
Answers are scored using ANLS (Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity), which gives partial credit for near-matches to the ground-truth answer string rather than requiring an exact match — standard practice for open-ended document VQA where minor formatting differences shouldn't be penalized as full misses.
| Rank | Model | Score | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Micro Vision Instruct | 65.2% | North Micro Vision launch blog | 2026-08 |
Score sourced from Cohere Labs' North Micro Vision Instruct launch announcement, August 2026, evaluated on the validation split.
No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run InfoVQA.
| Benchmark | What it tests | Saturation |
|---|---|---|
| InfoVQA | Dense infographics combining text, charts, and layout | Medium |
| DocVQA | Scanned/plain-text document question answering | High |
| ChartQA | Chart-specific reasoning and value extraction | Medium |
InfoVQA is a harder, more visually-complex sibling to DocVQA — use it when you need to evaluate a model's ability to parse mixed text-and-graphics layouts rather than mostly-linear scanned text.
Benchgen lets you evaluate your own vision-language model's infographic and document understanding and track results across model versions.