| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | gemini-3-1-pro | 94.3 |
| 2 | inkling | 91.4 |
1 phaseActive
TACL'26 benchmark for LLM-based voice assistants (Chen et al., 2024). Tests spoken instruction following, QA, and safety with real and synthetic audio across diverse speakers and environments. Metric: composite % score (rule-based + GPT judge). Apache 2.0.
Quick answer: VoiceBench is the first comprehensive benchmark for LLM-based voice assistants (Chen et al., TACL 2026, National University of Singapore). It evaluates models on diverse spoken instructions including both real human voices and synthetic speech, covering open-ended QA, multiple-choice, instruction following, reasoning, and safety tasks. The composite score aggregates rule-based and GPT-judge metrics across multiple subsets. Note: VoiceBench uses rule-based string matching for some evaluations, making scores sensitive to output formatting. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the Inkling comparison at 94.3%.
What it tests: An end-to-end voice assistant's ability to correctly understand and respond to spoken instructions varying in speaker characteristics (accent, age, noise), content types (factual, reasoning, creative), and difficulty (single-turn, multi-turn, safety).
Why it matters: Most voice assistant evaluations focus on ASR quality or general knowledge with clean speech, missing the real-world complexity of voice interactions. VoiceBench introduces multiple speech variation factors — diverse speaker characteristics, environmental noise, and challenging linguistic content — providing a more realistic evaluation of voice AI.
Known limitations: Some VoiceBench subsets use rule-based, hard-coded string matching for grading. The Inkling model card explicitly notes this "makes the evaluation sensitive to output-formatting differences" — models that produce correct answers in different formats may score lower than models matching expected strings exactly.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Audio / speech / voice assistants |
| Metric | Composite % (rule-based + GPT-judge, varies by subset) |
| Subsets | alpacaeval, commoneval, wildvoice, sd-qa, openbookqa, mmsu, ifeval, bbh, advbench |
| Speech types | Real human voices + Google TTS synthetic |
| Scoring caveat | Some subsets use string-match grading |
| Published | TACL 2026 |
| Created by | Yiming Chen, Xianghu Yue, Chen Zhang, Xiaoxue Gao, Robby T. Tan, Haizhou Li |
| Affiliation | National University of Singapore |
| Paper | VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (arXiv 2410.17196) |
| GitHub | MatthewCYM/VoiceBench |
| Dataset | hlt-lab/voicebench on HuggingFace |
Scores from Inkling model card (Thinking Machines Lab, July 2026). Only 2 models reported (native audio input required; other models not evaluated on this benchmark).
| Rank | Model | Score | Weights |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 94.3% | Closed |
| 2 | Inkling | 91.4% | Open |
Last updated 2026-07-16.