Benchgen
Models/alibaba/

Qwen3 30B A3B

DraftPublic

Model Details

Qwen3 30B A3B

Organization License Released MoE

Quick answer: Qwen3 30B A3B is Alibaba's May 2025 compact MoE model with 30B total parameters (3B active), scoring 91% Arena Hard, 62.6% LiveCodeBench, and 69.1% BFCL. Apache 2.0 — offers near-frontier Arena Hard at minimal inference cost.

At a Glance

Where Qwen3 30B A3B leads

  • 91% Arena Hard — near-frontier instruction quality at only 3B active params
  • 62.6% LiveCodeBench — excellent coding for its compute cost
  • 69.1% BFCL — strong function calling
  • MoE efficiency: 3B active params → low inference cost
  • Apache 2.0

Where it lags

  • 91% Arena Hard vs 95.6% for Qwen3 235B A22B — significant gap
  • Less capacity for complex reasoning than larger models
  • May 2025 release: pre-dates some newer models

Best for: Cost-efficient deployment requiring near-frontier instruction quality; API servers with limited GPU; teams wanting Qwen3-class performance at 3B active-param inference cost.

What Qwen3 30B A3B Is

Qwen3 30B A3B is the compact MoE model in Alibaba's Qwen3 generation. "30B A3B" means 30 billion total parameters with only 3 billion active per token inference pass. At 3B active params, inference cost is similar to a compact dense 3B model, while the full 30B capacity allows much higher quality.

The 91% Arena Hard score with 3B active parameters is remarkable — this is competitive with Qwen3 32B dense variants and near-frontier proprietary models, at a fraction of the per-token compute cost.

Specifications

FieldValue
OrganizationAlibaba
LicenseApache 2.0
HuggingFaceQwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B
Release dateMay 28, 2025
Parameters30B total / 3B active (MoE)
ModalityText only
Context window128K tokens

Pricing

Open weights under Apache 2.0 — self-host. Also available via Alibaba Cloud and third-party providers.

Public Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkScoreSourceDate
Arena Hard91%Benchgen evaluation2025-05
LiveCodeBench62.6%Benchgen evaluation2025-05
BFCL69.1%Benchgen evaluation2025-05

Qwen3 30B A3B vs Alternatives

ModelArena HardLiveCodeBenchActive ParamsLicense
Qwen3 30B A3B91%62.6%3BApache 2.0
Qwen3 235B A22B95.6%65.9%22BApache 2.0
QwQ-32B32BApache 2.0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct70BLlama 3.3

Qwen3 30B A3B vs 235B A22B: 91% vs 95.6% Arena Hard at 7x lower active-param cost. For most production deployments, 30B A3B is the efficiency winner.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Qwen3 30B A3B? Alibaba's May 2025 compact MoE model: 30B total parameters, 3B active at inference. 91% Arena Hard, 62.6% LiveCodeBench, 69.1% BFCL. Apache 2.0.
How does Qwen3 30B A3B compare to Qwen3 235B A22B? 235B A22B leads on Arena Hard (95.6% vs 91%) and LiveCodeBench (65.9% vs 62.6%) with 7.3x more active params (22B vs 3B). Choose 30B A3B for compute-cost efficiency; 235B A22B for maximum capability.

Specs from Alibaba's Qwen3 30B A3B release (May 2025) and Benchgen evaluations. Last updated 2026-07-24.

Benchmark Leaderboards

This model isn’t on any benchmark leaderboard yet.