Quick answer: Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google's flagship multimodal model, released March 25, 2025. It scores 21.64% on Humanity's Last Exam (among the highest at launch), 73.6% on LiveCodeBench, and 79.0% on Arena Hard v2, with a 1M-token context window — the largest available in its class at launch. Priced at $1.25 input / $10 output per 1M tokens (up to 200K input), with long-context surcharge above 200K.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Where it lags
Best for: Long-document analysis, whole-codebase reasoning, multimodal workflows (video, audio, image), and tasks where the 1M context window is a significant advantage over 200K alternatives.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google's most capable model at its March 2025 launch, sitting at the top of the Gemini 2.5 family (alongside Gemini 2.5 Flash). It is a natively multimodal model, designed from the ground up to process text, images, audio, and video in a single unified model — not through separate vision encoders bolted onto a language model.
The model's 1M-token context window was a defining feature at launch, enabling workflows that were impractical with 200K-context models: analysing entire software repositories, processing multi-hour video transcripts, or synthesising hundreds of research papers in a single request. A native "thinking" mode, similar in concept to Claude's extended thinking and OpenAI's o-series, enables stronger performance on hard reasoning tasks at the cost of additional output tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is accessed via Google AI Studio and the Gemini API (also available via Vertex AI for enterprise deployments). Its pricing model has a tiered structure: standard rates apply up to 200K input tokens per request, with a 2× surcharge for inputs above that threshold.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Organization | |
| Parameters | Undisclosed |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens |
| Architecture | Multimodal transformer (Gemini family) |
| License | Proprietary (API only) |
| Release date | March 25, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | January 2025 (estimated) |
| Modality | Text + Image + Audio + Video |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI (≤200K input) | $1.25 | $10.00 |
| Google AI (>200K input) | $2.50 | $15.00 |
Pricing per Google AI pricing page as of July 2026 — verify current rates before production use.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,000,000-token context window — roughly 750 pages of text in a single request. This is the primary capability advantage over 200K models like o3 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet. At standard pricing this applies to the first 200K input tokens; requests above 200K input are billed at 2× the standard input rate.
| Benchmark | Score | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.64% | Benchgen evaluation | 2025-07 |
| Arena Hard v2 | 79.0% | Benchgen evaluation | 2025-07 |
| LiveCodeBench | 73.6% | Benchgen evaluation | 2025-07 |
| BigCodeBench | 33.1% | Benchgen evaluation | 2025-07 |
| AetherCode | 32.7% | Benchgen evaluation | 2025-07 |
| SHADE-Arena | 14.8 overall success | Anthropic research post | 2025-06 |
Scores from Benchgen evaluations or attributed third-party sources. Figures depend on harness, effort setting, and tools — see the source for methodology.
| Model | Context | HLE | LiveCodeBench | Price (in/out per 1M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 1M | 21.64% | 73.6% | $1.25 / $10 |
| o3 | 200K | 20.32% | 75.8% | $10 / $40 |
| o4-mini | 200K | 14.28% | 74.2% | $1.10 / $4.40 |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 200K | 8.04% | — | $3 / $15 |
| DeepSeek R1 | 128K | — | — | ~$0.55 / $2.19 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro's strongest case: highest HLE score (21.64%) among this group, 5× larger context window than o3/o4-mini, and strong multimodal coverage — at 8× lower cost than o3. Its main trade-off is the long-context pricing surcharge above 200K tokens, which makes it more expensive than its headline rate for very large inputs.
Gemini 2.5 Pro's AetherCode score of 32.7% (agentic web task performance) and SHADE-Arena score of 14.8% reveal its relative weaknesses vs its general benchmark profile. It is a strong general-purpose model but underperforms on specialised agentic and cybersecurity tasks compared to models like GPT-5.6 Sol.
For agent builders, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the recommended choice when the 1M context window is a hard requirement — processing large codebases, legal documents, or multi-session conversation histories where 200K models need chunking. For coding-focused agents that fit within 200K context, o4-mini is competitive in performance at a lower headline price.
import google.generativeai as genai
genai.configure(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
model = genai.GenerativeModel("gemini-2.5-pro")
response = model.generate_content(
"Analyse this 500-page contract and summarise the key obligations...",
)
print(response.text)Specs and scores sourced from Google's official Gemini 2.5 Pro announcement (March 25, 2025) and Benchgen evaluations; third-party benchmark scores attributed inline. Pricing cited to the Google AI pricing page. Last updated 2026-07-23.
This model isn’t on any benchmark leaderboard yet.