Quick answer: GPT-5.1 Thinking is the extended chain-of-thought reasoning variant of GPT-5.1. By spending additional compute on internal reasoning tokens before generating a response, it achieves higher scores on hard math (AIME/GPQA) and complex coding problems. It is priced at a premium over standard GPT-5.1 to reflect the additional inference compute.
GPT-5.1 Thinking continues OpenAI's "o-series" tradition of extended reasoning models, now unified within the GPT-5.1 family. Rather than a separate model family (as o1, o3 were), Thinking is a mode of GPT-5.1 that allocates a larger thinking budget before responding — analogous to Claude's extended thinking mode.
For Benchgen workloads, Thinking mode excels at tasks requiring careful planning: multi-step debugging, architecture design, formal proof-like reasoning over code, and research synthesis. For standard coding agent loops, the standard GPT-5.1 or GPT-5.1 Codex are usually more cost-efficient.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI |
| Reasoning mode | Extended chain-of-thought |
| License | Proprietary |
| Modality | Multimodal (text and vision) |
Last updated 2026-06-19.
Available via OpenAI API. Refer to OpenAI pricing for GPT-5.1 Thinking.
| Model | BrowseComp | GPQA-Diamond | HLE | License |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.1 Thinking | 90.0% | 88.1% | 23.68% | Proprietary |
| GPT-5.1 Instant | 90.0% | 88.1% | 6.80% | Proprietary |
GPT-5.1 Thinking vs Instant: same BrowseComp + GPQA-Diamond but 3.5x higher HLE (23.68% vs 6.80%) — extended thinking pays off on frontier reasoning.
Scores from Benchgen evaluations. Last updated 2026-07-24.
This model isn’t on any benchmark leaderboard yet.