| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | gpt-5-5 | 0.85 |
| 2 | gemini-3-1-pro | 0.771 |
| 3 | gpt-5-4 | 0.733 |
| 4 | claude-opus-4-6 | 0.688 |
| 5 | claude-sonnet-4-6 | 0.583 |
| 6 | gpt-5-2-pro-2025-12-11 | 0.542 |
| 7 | gpt-5-2 | 0.529 |
| 8 | muse-spark | 0.425 |
| 9 | claude-opus-4-5 | 0.376 |
| 10 | gemini-3-flash | 0.336 |
| 11 | gemini-3-pro | 0.311 |
| 12 | grok-4 | 0.159 |
| 13 | claude-opus-4 | 0.086 |
| 14 | o3 | 0.065 |
| 15 | gemini-2-5-pro | 0.049 |
1 phaseActive
Chollet et al.'s harder successor to ARC-AGI: visual grid transformations measuring fluid reasoning. 800 tasks, 0–1 scale. Not saturated — top score 85.0%.
Quick answer: ARC-AGI v2 is the second-generation Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus benchmark, introduced by François Chollet and collaborators in May 2025 to address the near-saturation of the original ARC-AGI. It uses the same visual grid transformation format — models must infer hidden rules from input/output examples and apply them to a test grid — but with significantly harder task designs that remain challenging even for frontier models. GPT-5.5 leads at 85.0%.
What it tests: Abstract visual reasoning: given a small number of input→output grid examples, infer the underlying transformation rule and apply it to a novel test grid. Requires spatial reasoning, pattern recognition, and compositional generalisation.
Why it matters: ARC-AGI v2 was designed specifically because the original ARC-AGI approached saturation for frontier models. V2 maintains the same evaluation philosophy — tests should be easy for humans but hard for current AI — while being substantially harder, preserving its value as a signal for true generalisation.
Known limitations: Scored on a 0–1 scale; tasks are not representative of all reasoning types (domain is visual/spatial). The benchmark is still early and the leaderboard is small relative to more established benchmarks.
ARC-AGI v2 inherits the core ARC format: each task provides 2–5 input/output grid pairs demonstrating a hidden transformation. The model must identify the rule and produce the correct output for a held-out test input. Grids use up to 10 colours in cells ranging from 1×1 to 30×30.
V2 introduces harder task designs with more complex compositional rules, multi-step transformations, and higher sensitivity to spatial configuration. Where frontier models could approach 95%+ on the original ARC-AGI using test-time compute scaling, V2 creates meaningful differentiation — with a 50-point gap between the leader (85%) and models like Gemini 2.5 Pro (4.9%).
The benchmark is multimodal: models receive grids as visual inputs, making it relevant for evaluating vision-language models' abstract reasoning capabilities alongside text-only reasoning systems.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Abstract reasoning / Vision |
| Metric | Accuracy (fraction of tasks solved, 0–1) |
| Number of tasks | ~800 (public evaluation set) |
| Grid size | Up to 30×30 |
| Colours | 10 |
| Saturation | Medium |
| Created by | Chollet et al. (ARC Prize Foundation) |
| Source paper | Chollet et al. 2025 |
| Modality | Multimodal (vision + text) |
Each task is binary: solved (1) or not solved (0). The score is the fraction of tasks solved. Models are typically allowed multiple attempts per task, and a task is counted correct if any attempt produces the right output. The 0–1 normalised scale means a score of 0.850 = 85% of tasks solved.
A score above 0.7 is considered frontier-tier. Human performance on ARC-AGI tasks approaches 1.0, making it the target ceiling.
No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run ARC-AGI v2.
| Benchmark | What it tests | Tasks | Saturation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI v2 | Visual grid transformation (harder) | ~800 | Medium |
| ARC-AGI | Visual grid transformation (original) | 400 | High |
| GPQA Diamond | Expert-level science reasoning | 198 | Low |
| Humanity's Last Exam | Frontier academic knowledge | 3000 | Low |
ARC-AGI v2 is the go-to benchmark when you want to evaluate generalisation and fluid reasoning without saturation concerns that affect the original ARC-AGI.
Use Benchgen to run ARC-AGI v2 against your model continuously — tracking how reasoning capability evolves across fine-tuning runs, prompt changes, or model versions. Unlike one-time leaderboard submissions, Benchgen gives you a regression-tracked history of abstract reasoning performance.
Benchmark definition paraphrased from Chollet et al. 2025. State-of-the-art scores sourced from llm-stats.com and attributed inline. Last updated 2026-07-23.