Benchgen

ARC-E — Results

RankModelScore
1gemma-2-27b0.886
2gemma-2-9b0.88
3hermes-3-70b0.83
4gemma-3n-e4b-litert-preview0.816
5gemma-3n-e4b0.816
6gemma-3n-e2b-litert-preview0.758
7gemma-3n-e2b0.758
8ernie-4-50.607
A

ARC-E

1 phaseActive

AI2 Reasoning Challenge easy subset: 2376 science MCQs answerable by retrieval methods. Accuracy metric, high saturation. Clark et al. 2018.

Overview

ARC-E

Category Metric Tasks Saturation Created

Paper Dataset

Quick answer: ARC-E (AI2 Reasoning Challenge — Easy Set) is the accessible half of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge, containing 2376 grade-school science multiple-choice questions that at least one retrieval-based method could answer. It measures basic scientific knowledge and factual reasoning. Introduced by Clark et al. in 2018, it is highly saturated at the frontier with only 8 models evaluated — the leader Gemma 2 27B scores 88.6%.

At a Glance

What it tests: Basic scientific knowledge and factual recall through grade-school level multiple-choice questions. Unlike ARC-C, these questions are simpler and can be answered by retrieval-based systems.

Why it matters: ARC-E provides a baseline scientific literacy test for smaller models and serves as a complementary lower bound when used alongside ARC-C. It is especially useful for establishing that a model has absorbed basic scientific knowledge during pre-training.

Known limitations: Highly saturated — only 8 models have been evaluated and the benchmark no longer differentiates frontier capabilities meaningfully. ARC-C or GPQA Diamond are better choices for frontier evaluation.

What ARC-E Measures

ARC-E is the Easy Set partition of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge dataset. It contains questions where at least one of a retrieval-based system or a word co-occurrence system answered correctly. This makes ARC-E substantially more accessible than ARC-C — the questions can often be solved by knowing the right keywords rather than deriving an answer through multi-step reasoning.

The 2376-question test split covers the same domains as ARC-C: life science, Earth science, physical science, and general scientific knowledge at a grade 3–9 level. The multiple-choice format (3–4 options) is identical to ARC-C.

ARC-E is primarily useful for evaluating smaller language models, quantised variants, or edge-deployed models where basic scientific knowledge retention is the relevant signal.

Benchmark Specifications

FieldValue
Task categoryReasoning (scientific knowledge)
MetricAccuracy (fraction correct, 0–1)
Number of tasks2376 (test split), 5197 (full split)
FormatMultiple-choice (3–4 options)
DomainGrade-school science (grades 3–9)
SaturationHigh
Created byClark et al. (Allen Institute for AI)
Source paperClark et al. 2018
Datasetallenai/ai2_arc

How ARC-E Is Scored

Each question is scored as correct (1) or incorrect (0) based on the selected multiple-choice answer. The final score is the fraction of questions answered correctly. No retrieval or external tools are permitted. Scores range from 0–1 (reported as percentages in some leaderboards).

ARC-E on Benchgen

No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run ARC-E.

ARC-E vs Other Benchmarks

BenchmarkWhat it testsTasksSaturation
ARC-EGrade-school science (easy)2376High
ARC-CGrade-school science (challenge)1119High
MMLUMultidomain knowledge (57 subjects)14042High
GPQA DiamondExpert-level science198Low

Use ARC-E alongside ARC-C to evaluate a model's full spectrum of basic scientific knowledge. For frontier evaluation, GPQA Diamond or MMLU-Pro provide better signal.

Run ARC-E on Your Model

Benchgen makes it straightforward to include ARC-E as a regression checkpoint in your evaluation pipeline — confirming that fine-tuning or quantisation has not degraded basic scientific knowledge retrieval.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ARC-E benchmark? ARC-E (AI2 Reasoning Challenge — Easy Set) is the accessible subset of the ARC dataset, containing 2376 grade-school science multiple-choice questions that at least one retrieval-based system could answer. It tests basic scientific knowledge and factual recall. See Clark et al. 2018.
What does a good ARC-E score look like? Capable models typically score 0.75–0.89. The current leader scores 0.886. ARC-E is less discriminating than ARC-C for frontier models — most capable models perform similarly.
Who created ARC-E? ARC-E shares the same authors as ARC-C: Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, and colleagues at the Allen Institute for AI. Published March 2018 — see arXiv 1803.05457.
Is ARC-E saturated? Yes. Very few models have been evaluated on ARC-E (8 as of mid-2026) and the benchmark no longer differentiates frontier capabilities. It is primarily useful for smaller models or basic regression testing.
How does ARC-E differ from ARC-C? ARC-E contains questions that retrieval-based methods could answer — making them generally easier. ARC-C filters for questions that defeated retrieval methods, requiring genuine reasoning. Both benchmarks share the same paper, dataset, and multiple-choice format.

Benchmark definition paraphrased from Clark et al. 2018. Last updated 2026-07-23.