| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | gemma-2-27b | 0.886 |
| 2 | gemma-2-9b | 0.88 |
| 3 | hermes-3-70b | 0.83 |
| 4 | gemma-3n-e4b-litert-preview | 0.816 |
| 5 | gemma-3n-e4b | 0.816 |
| 6 | gemma-3n-e2b-litert-preview | 0.758 |
| 7 | gemma-3n-e2b | 0.758 |
| 8 | ernie-4-5 | 0.607 |
1 phaseActive
AI2 Reasoning Challenge easy subset: 2376 science MCQs answerable by retrieval methods. Accuracy metric, high saturation. Clark et al. 2018.
Quick answer: ARC-E (AI2 Reasoning Challenge — Easy Set) is the accessible half of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge, containing 2376 grade-school science multiple-choice questions that at least one retrieval-based method could answer. It measures basic scientific knowledge and factual reasoning. Introduced by Clark et al. in 2018, it is highly saturated at the frontier with only 8 models evaluated — the leader Gemma 2 27B scores 88.6%.
What it tests: Basic scientific knowledge and factual recall through grade-school level multiple-choice questions. Unlike ARC-C, these questions are simpler and can be answered by retrieval-based systems.
Why it matters: ARC-E provides a baseline scientific literacy test for smaller models and serves as a complementary lower bound when used alongside ARC-C. It is especially useful for establishing that a model has absorbed basic scientific knowledge during pre-training.
Known limitations: Highly saturated — only 8 models have been evaluated and the benchmark no longer differentiates frontier capabilities meaningfully. ARC-C or GPQA Diamond are better choices for frontier evaluation.
ARC-E is the Easy Set partition of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge dataset. It contains questions where at least one of a retrieval-based system or a word co-occurrence system answered correctly. This makes ARC-E substantially more accessible than ARC-C — the questions can often be solved by knowing the right keywords rather than deriving an answer through multi-step reasoning.
The 2376-question test split covers the same domains as ARC-C: life science, Earth science, physical science, and general scientific knowledge at a grade 3–9 level. The multiple-choice format (3–4 options) is identical to ARC-C.
ARC-E is primarily useful for evaluating smaller language models, quantised variants, or edge-deployed models where basic scientific knowledge retention is the relevant signal.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Reasoning (scientific knowledge) |
| Metric | Accuracy (fraction correct, 0–1) |
| Number of tasks | 2376 (test split), 5197 (full split) |
| Format | Multiple-choice (3–4 options) |
| Domain | Grade-school science (grades 3–9) |
| Saturation | High |
| Created by | Clark et al. (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Source paper | Clark et al. 2018 |
| Dataset | allenai/ai2_arc |
Each question is scored as correct (1) or incorrect (0) based on the selected multiple-choice answer. The final score is the fraction of questions answered correctly. No retrieval or external tools are permitted. Scores range from 0–1 (reported as percentages in some leaderboards).
No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run ARC-E.
| Benchmark | What it tests | Tasks | Saturation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-E | Grade-school science (easy) | 2376 | High |
| ARC-C | Grade-school science (challenge) | 1119 | High |
| MMLU | Multidomain knowledge (57 subjects) | 14042 | High |
| GPQA Diamond | Expert-level science | 198 | Low |
Use ARC-E alongside ARC-C to evaluate a model's full spectrum of basic scientific knowledge. For frontier evaluation, GPQA Diamond or MMLU-Pro provide better signal.
Benchgen makes it straightforward to include ARC-E as a regression checkpoint in your evaluation pipeline — confirming that fine-tuning or quantisation has not degraded basic scientific knowledge retrieval.
Benchmark definition paraphrased from Clark et al. 2018. Last updated 2026-07-23.