| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | lfm2-5-vl-3b | 87.9 |
| 2 | north-micro-vision-instruct | 73.2 |
1 phaseActive
Referring expression comprehension benchmark built on MS-COCO images. Metric: precision@1 across val/testA/testB splits, averaged.
Quick answer: RefCOCO is a referring expression comprehension benchmark built on MS-COCO images, testing whether a model can locate the specific object in an image described by a natural-language expression (e.g., "the woman in the red hat"). Scores are typically reported as precision@1 averaged across the val, testA, and testB splits (and the related RefCOCO+ and RefCOCOg variants). LFM2.5-VL-3B averages 87.9% across these splits as of August 2026.
What it tests: A vision-language model's ability to ground a natural-language referring expression to the single correct object instance in an image, typically scored via bounding-box overlap or precision@1.
Why it matters: Referring expression comprehension underlies visual grounding for tool use and robotics — an agent that needs to "click the second button from the left" or "pick up the blue mug" depends on the same grounding skill RefCOCO measures.
Known limitations: RefCOCO is over a decade old and built on MS-COCO's relatively narrow object categories; frontier models now score in the high 80s–90s, making the benchmark less discriminating at the top end than newer grounding benchmarks.
RefCOCO (and its variants RefCOCO+ and RefCOCOg) was introduced by Kazemzadeh et al. as a dataset of natural-language referring expressions collected via a two-player game, paired with MS-COCO images containing multiple instances of the same object category. A model must identify which specific instance the expression refers to — disambiguating between, for example, multiple people or multiple chairs in the same image.
RefCOCO+ removes location-based expressions (forcing purely appearance-based descriptions), while RefCOCOg uses longer, more descriptive expressions collected in a non-interactive setting. Scores across all splits (val, testA, testB for RefCOCO/RefCOCO+; val, test for RefCOCOg) are commonly averaged into a single "RefCOCO-avg" headline metric, as reported by Liquid AI for LFM2.5-VL-3B.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Task category | Reasoning (visual grounding) |
| Metric | Precision@1, averaged across RefCOCO/RefCOCO+/RefCOCOg splits |
| Saturation | Medium |
| Created by | Kazemzadeh et al. |
| Source paper | Kazemzadeh et al. 2014 |
| GitHub | lichengunc/refer |
| Dataset | jxu124/refcoco on HuggingFace |
For each referring expression, the model predicts a bounding box or point; the prediction is scored correct (precision@1) if it sufficiently overlaps with (or falls within) the ground-truth object's region. Per-split scores (val/testA/testB and the RefCOCO+/RefCOCOg equivalents) are commonly averaged into one headline number.
| Rank | Model | Score | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 87.9% (avg) | LFM2.5-VL-3B launch blog | 2026-08 |
Score sourced from Liquid AI's LFM2.5-VL-3B announcement, August 2026.
No Benchgen results yet — be the first to run RefCOCO.
| Benchmark | What it tests | Saturation |
|---|---|---|
| RefCOCO | Referring expression comprehension (object grounding) | Medium |
| ScreenSpot-v2 | GUI element grounding | Medium |
| BLINK | Multi-image visual perception | Low |
Benchgen lets you evaluate your own vision-language model's grounding accuracy and track it across model and version changes.